BLOG |
Employer of Record & PEO
Published:
November 25, 2025
Last updated:
November 25, 2025
.png)
AYP Group’s switching costs for manufacturing sales teams fall into three main components:
For finance managers evaluating total transition investment, AYP’s direct entity operations across 14+ APAC markets reduce switching costs materially.
A complete transition for a 60-person team typically totals USD 30,000–72,000 (onboarding, migration, and overlap), compared to USD 50,000–120,000 for partner-dependent providers.
This represents a 25%–40% reduction in switching barriers, while simultaneously establishing the foundation for 12%–18% ongoing annual savings driven by the elimination of partner markups and improved operational efficiency.
Finance managers in manufacturing companies nearing the final decision stage require a precise breakdown of all cost components involved in transitioning sales teams from an existing EOR provider to AYP Group. Clear visibility into these costs supports accurate budget requests, board approvals, and ROI modelling that justify the switching investment through predictable savings and improved service delivery.
AYP’s onboarding fees cover the full employment setup process, including:
For a 60-person sales team distributed across six APAC markets (SG 10, MY 12, VN 10, TH 10, ID 10, PH 8), total onboarding fees amount to:
USD 14,200–20,700
(derived from market-level headcount × respective per-employee fee ranges).
Data migration and transition management service costs:
In addition to per-employee onboarding, full transitions require comprehensive data transfer work, including:
AYP’s data migration and transition management typically costs USD 3,000–8,000, influenced by:
This covers dedicated project management, data accuracy validation, configuration, parallel payroll testing, and 60-day post-go-live enhanced support.
For most manufacturing companies, the single largest switching cost is the overlap period when both providers bill simultaneously. This occurs because:
A 60-person team at USD 500 per employee/month represents USD 30,000 per month in baseline cost.
Overlap impact:
The overlap duration directly determines total switching cost magnitude—making implementation speed financially critical.
How AYP's 2 to 3 week onboarding minimizes duplication: AYP’s direct entity model enables 2–3 week onboarding, compared to 6–8 weeks for partner-network competitors. This reduces total overlap from:
Financial impact for 60 employees:
AYP eliminates roughly USD 33,750 in duplication costs—often exceeding AYP’s own setup and migration fees, making the transition effectively self-funding.
Finance managers evaluating a transition to AYP must demonstrate a clear, defensible ROI timeline—showing when the initial switching investment is fully recovered through ongoing cost savings. The calculation requires three inputs:
Break-even: USD 55,000 ÷ USD 60,000 = 0.92 years (~11 months)
Outcome: By Month 12, the transition fully pays for itself. Years 2 and 3 generate pure incremental savings.
Break-even: USD 70,000 ÷ USD 42,000 = 1.67 years (~20 months)
Outcome: Payback occurs near the end of Year 2, with Year 3 delivering full-year net benefit.
Most CFOs and boards approve switching investments based on these thresholds:
A complete switching cost model goes beyond provider fees. Finance managers should account for internal resource consumption, temporary productivity impacts, and retention-related risk mitigation—each of which materially influences the true cost and ROI of transitioning to AYP.
Switching providers requires significant internal involvement across Finance, HR, Sales, and IT. Typical time investments include:
At loaded cost rates of USD 100–200/hour, internal resource consumption adds USD 12,000–30,000 to the true switching investment.
This opportunity cost should be included in ROI models, as it reflects actual organizational expenditure even without external invoices.
Even well-managed transitions introduce short-term productivity friction. Sales teams may encounter:
These typically translate into 3–5% productivity reduction across a 2–3 month stabilization period.
For a 60-person sales team generating USD 30M annual revenue:
Finance should model scenarios:
This enables risk-adjusted ROI calculations rather than optimistic single-scenario forecasting.
Transitions introduce psychological risk for top-performing sales reps who may interpret administrative disruption as organizational instability. To prevent avoidable attrition, finance teams often budget temporary retention measures such as:
These measures add USD 10,000–40,000 to switching costs.
However, they protect against far larger financial losses:
A modest USD 20,000 retention investment that prevents 5–10% attrition risk (2–4 departures) avoids USD 240,000–1.8M in replacement costs—yielding overwhelmingly positive expected value.
Manufacturing finance managers approve USD 50,000 to 75,000 switching investments because comprehensive ROI analysis shows: 11 to 20 month payback periods through 12% to 18% ongoing annual savings (USD 35,000 to 70,000 for typical 60-person APAC teams), cumulative three-year net benefit of USD 55,000 to 140,000 after recovering switching costs, and risk-adjusted returns exceeding most operational improvement initiatives when accounting for service quality enhancements and compliance risk reduction alongside pure cost savings.
Beyond quantifiable cost savings, AYP transitions deliver: faster seasonal onboarding (2 to 3 weeks enabling timely peak season staffing versus 6 to 8 weeks creating operational constraints), commission processing accuracy (automated handling of installation bonuses, distributor overrides, tiered commissions eliminating manual calculation errors and employee disputes), manufacturing sector compliance expertise (reducing audit exposure and legal consultation needs), and APAC-specialized support (regional timezone availability with cultural context versus global support centers covering 160+ countries superficially).
These service improvements don't appear in ROI calculations but influence decision-making when finance managers recognize that current provider limitations create operational friction, compliance uncertainty, or employee satisfaction issues justifying investment in superior alternative.
Manufacturing companies planning sales organization growth from current 60 to 100+ employees over 24 to 36 months view switching costs as strategic platform investment rather than pure operational expense. Establishing relationship with AYP (covering 14+ APAC markets through direct entities) prevents future provider changes as expansion occurs, avoiding multiple switching cost cycles and creating operational continuity as teams scale across the region.
AYP Group can provide itemized proposal showing: per-employee onboarding fees for your exact market distribution, data migration scope and costs based on your current provider and data complexity, dual-provider overlap period estimate with timeline details, total switching investment summary, projected annual ongoing savings from direct entity operations and operational efficiencies, and payback period calculation, enabling confident decision-stage financial approval and board presentation for your EOR provider transition.
Total switching investment typically ranges USD 52,950 to 72,450 including: per-employee onboarding fees USD 14,200 to 20,700 (USD 237 to 345 average across APAC markets), data migration and transition management USD 3,000 to 8,000, dual-provider overlap period USD 33,750 (based on 4.5-week duplication at USD 30,000 monthly team cost through AYP's fast implementation), platform training USD 2,000 to 5,000, and optional legal review USD 0 to 5,000. This compares favorably to partner-network competitors requiring USD 98,000 to 138,500 for same 60-person team due to slower implementations creating longer dual-provider overlap periods and higher per-employee setup fees.
Payback periods typically range 11 to 20 months depending on: magnitude of ongoing savings (USD 35,000 to 70,000 annually from eliminated partner coordination fees, reduced administrative burden, and lower per-employee rates for some markets), total switching investment (USD 52,950 to 72,450 as detailed above), and whether productivity or retention costs materialize during transition. Favorable scenarios (USD 55,000 switching cost, USD 60,000 annual savings) break even in 11 months. Conservative scenarios (USD 70,000 switching cost, USD 42,000 annual savings) require 20 months. Most manufacturing companies achieve payback within 18 months, after which years two and three deliver pure incremental value.
Yes, AYP's team will provide a transparent structure that covers every need, which enables accurate budget forecasting at proposal stage versus providers with hidden costs emerging during implementation.
AYP's 2 to 3 week onboarding through direct entity operations versus 6 to 8 weeks for partner-dependent competitors reduces dual-provider overlap periods from 8 to 10 weeks down to 4 to 5 weeks. For 60-person team at USD 30,000 monthly cost, this saves USD 30,000 to 45,000 in duplicated expenses. The duplication savings often exceed AYP's onboarding and migration fees (USD 17,200 to 28,700), making the transition partially or fully self-funding through overlap cost avoidance. Finance managers should model dual-provider overlap as largest switching cost component, making implementation speed the critical variable determining total investment.
