BLOG |
Compliance
Published:
January 10, 2026
Last updated:
January 10, 2026


Asia Pacific (APAC) represents one of the world's most dynamic business regions, home to more than half the global population across diverse markets including Singapore, Malaysia, Philippines, Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia, Hong Kong, China, Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Cambodia, Australia, and India. This cultural and economic diversity creates tremendous opportunities for mid-sized companies scaling regional operations, but also introduces significant complexity when managing workforce transitions.
For regional HR leaders managing 100–300 employees across 3–7 APAC markets, employee termination represents one of the most consequential compliance and reputational risks in multi-country operations. Unlike expanding within a single regulatory framework where termination procedures remain consistent, APAC expansion requires navigating fundamentally different labor law protections, notice period requirements, severance calculations, and procedural obligations that vary dramatically across jurisdictions.
Understanding the strategic challenges and legal considerations when navigating employee termination in APAC helps regional HR leaders make informed decisions, manage transitions ethically, maintain compliance, and protect organizational reputation across markets.
When scaling across APAC, accumulated expertise from one market doesn't transfer. Each jurisdiction operates under distinct legal frameworks with different employee protections, employer obligations, and enforcement mechanisms.
The strategic challenge: Building termination expertise across 5–7 APAC markets requires either hiring in-country HR and legal specialists in each jurisdiction, or partnering with regional providers who absorb this complexity through direct entity presence and local advisory capabilities.
The compliance exposure: Improper termination handling creates cascading risks: employee lawsuits, labor tribunal claims, regulatory penalties, reputational damage, and potential scrutiny of practices in other jurisdictions.
Philippines: Strong security of tenure protections make terminating regular employees operationally challenging. Employers must establish "just cause" or "authorized cause" with strict procedural compliance. Illegal dismissal results in reinstatement obligations, full back wages, and potentially moral and exemplary damages.
Singapore: More employer-flexible framework. Termination with proper notice or payment in lieu generally acceptable for performance or business reasons, though Ministry of Manpower may investigate wrongful dismissal claims.
Malaysia: Employment Act provides termination frameworks with notice period requirements (typically 1 month) and potential compensation if dismissal deemed "without just cause or excuse." Industrial Relations Act allows unfair dismissal claims within 60 days.
Vietnam: Labor Code 2019 requires specific grounds for unilateral termination: employee violations, inability to perform work, force majeure, or business restructuring. Improper procedure creates liability for severance pay and compensation.
Indonesia: Complex regulations require employers to attempt bipartite negotiation before involving labor authorities. Severance calculations include multiple components varying by termination reason and tenure.
Japan: Strong employment protection makes dismissals difficult without objective reasonable grounds. Employers typically use voluntary resignation programs or negotiated departures rather than unilateral termination.
What constitutes proper termination procedure in Singapore may be grossly inadequate in Philippines or Japan.
Learn more about Philippines employment compliance including termination requirements.
Employee termination processes in APAC vary from relatively straightforward (Singapore, Hong Kong) to highly procedural (Philippines, Indonesia, Japan).
Philippines two-notice rule: Terminating for just cause requires (1) written notice specifying grounds and opportunity to explain, (2) hearing allowing employee to respond with counsel/representative, (3) written notice of decision with findings. Procedural defects may render termination illegal even if substantive cause exists.
Indonesia bipartite negotiation: Before seeking labor authority approval, employers must attempt resolution through direct negotiation. Failed negotiation must be documented before escalating.
Vietnam performance termination: Requires written warnings, performance improvement plans, and documentation showing employee failed to improve after reasonable opportunity.
Malaysia domestic inquiry: Terminating for misconduct typically requires formal internal investigation with notice of allegations, opportunity to present defense, witness testimony, and written findings.
China negotiated termination: Unilateral termination faces high legal barriers. Most terminations happen through negotiated departure with mutual agreement on severance terms.
For organizations managing workforce reductions affecting 10-50 employees across 3-5 APAC markets, coordinating different procedural timelines creates operational burden.
Cultural communication styles, face-saving considerations, and varying expectations about directness create complexity in APAC termination conversations.
Direct vs. indirect communication: Western conversations often emphasize directness about performance deficiencies. Many APAC cultures prefer indirect communication preserving face and harmony. Overly direct conversations in Philippines, Thailand, or Indonesia may provoke defensive reactions.
Hierarchy and authority: In high power distance markets (Philippines, Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand), termination conversations should involve appropriate seniority level. Junior HR staff terminating senior employees may be perceived as disrespectful.
Negotiation expectations: In many APAC markets (China, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia), employees expect termination to involve negotiation about severance terms, timing, and transition support.
Language barriers: Conducting conversations in English when employees have limited proficiency creates comprehension risk and may be legally insufficient in jurisdictions requiring notices in local language.
Terminations impact organizational reputation internally (remaining employees) and externally (talent market, clients, stakeholders).
Social media amplification: Disgruntled employees actively use LinkedIn, Glassdoor, JobStreet, Indeed, and local forums to share termination experiences. Negative reviews about unfair treatment or unpaid severance damage employer brand.
Talent market perception: In tight labor markets (Singapore tech, Philippines BPO, Malaysia mid-level professionals), word spreads quickly about employers who mishandle terminations. Poor reputation affects ability to attract quality candidates.
Remaining employee morale: Employees who witness colleagues being terminated unfairly experience decreased engagement and loyalty. High-performing employees begin exploring exit options.
Regulatory scrutiny: Labor authorities track patterns of employee complaints. Organizations with multiple termination disputes may face increased regulatory scrutiny.
For mid-sized organizations building regional presence, maintaining reputation becomes strategic priority. Short-term cost savings from aggressive termination approaches often create long-term talent costs exceeding severance savings.
Notice period requirements:
Severance pay obligations:
Explore payroll and statutory compliance across APAC markets.

Organizations with sustained long-term presence (500+ employees, 5+ years) may justify building in-country HR and legal expertise.
When this works: Large operations with volume justifying specialized resources; highly regulated industries requiring deep compliance expertise; organizations prioritizing maximum operational control.
Organizations scaling across multiple APAC markets without building in-country infrastructure benefit from EOR services providing termination advisory and execution support.
EOR termination support includes:
When this works: Organizations managing 100-300 employees across 3-7 APAC markets; companies testing market viability; businesses lacking bandwidth to build in-country HR teams.
Learn more about EOR solutions for APAC expansion.
Employee termination across Asia Pacific creates consequential compliance and reputational risk. Each jurisdiction's unique labor law protections, procedural requirements, and cultural expectations compound complexity as regional headcount grows.
AYP Group's Employer of Record services provide comprehensive termination advisory and execution support across 14+ APAC markets through:
By partnering with AYP's EOR services, your organization manages workforce transitions confidently while protecting employee dignity, organizational reputation, and legal position.
Explore AYP's EOR services across APAC markets, or learn about compliance challenges in hiring employees across Asia.
No. Termination letters must comply with jurisdiction-specific legal requirements regarding language (local language often legally required), content (grounds for termination stated with appropriate detail level), notice period, severance entitlement, and appeals process.
Severance adequacy varies by market. Some jurisdictions have statutory minimums (Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia); others have no requirement but market practices (Singapore, Hong Kong). Consult local counsel on market-appropriate amounts and tax implications.
Probation termination rules vary significantly. Singapore and Hong Kong allow relatively straightforward probation termination. Philippines requires just cause even during probation unless termination based on reasonable standards made known at hire. Always verify jurisdiction-specific probation rules.
Timeline varies dramatically: Singapore 1-4 weeks, Malaysia 1-2 months, Philippines 2-3 months, Indonesia 2-6 months, Vietnam 1-2 months, Japan 3-6+ months.
Consequences may include: reinstatement orders (Philippines particularly), back wages from termination until resolution, compensation awards, legal fees, regulatory penalties, and reputational damage.