Employer of Record (EOR)

What is an Employer of Record? An Employer of Record (EOR) is a third-party organization that serves as the legal employer for workers on behalf of another company, handling all employment-related responsibilities, compliance, and administrative tasks while the client company maintains control over the day-to-day work and management of those employees.

The EOR model enables companies to hire employees in countries where they don't have a legal entity, eliminating the need to establish subsidiaries or branches while ensuring full compliance with local labor laws, tax regulations, and employment standards.

How Employer of Record works

The three-party relationship:

1. The EOR (like AYP Group): Acts as the legal employer, handling all employment responsibilities
2. The client company: Manages day-to-day work, assignments, and performance
3. The employee: Works for the client company but is legally employed by the EOR

Key EOR responsibilities:

• Serving as the legal employer on record
• Drafting and executing employment contracts compliant with local laws
• Processing payroll and ensuring timely payment
• Managing statutory deductions (taxes, social security, pension contributions)
• Providing or facilitating employee benefits
• Ensuring compliance with all local labor laws and regulations
• Handling HR administration (leave tracking, documentation, etc.)
• Managing employment changes (salary adjustments, promotions, transfers)
• Processing terminations according to local legal requirements
• Maintaining employment records and managing government reporting

Client company responsibilities:

• Managing daily work assignments and responsibilities
• Directing employee performance and productivity
• Conducting performance reviews and feedback
• Making decisions about promotions, bonuses, and compensation
• Providing work tools, technology, and training
• Managing team culture and integration

When to use an Employer of Record

Ideal scenarios:

• Hiring employees in countries without a local entity
• Testing new markets with small teams before committing to entity establishment
• Expanding quickly across multiple countries simultaneously
• Hiring remote workers in diverse locations
• Avoiding the time and cost of establishing legal entities
• Lacking local HR, legal, and payroll expertise
• Needing flexibility to scale or exit markets
• Managing compliance risks in unfamiliar jurisdictions

EOR vs. other employment models

EOR vs. Direct Employment:

• EOR: No entity needed, quick deployment, outsourced compliance
• Direct: Full control, better for large teams, requires entity establishment

EOR vs. Professional Employer Organization (PEO):

• EOR: Acts as legal employer, no local entity required
• PEO: Co-employment model, requires client to have a local entity

EOR vs. Contractors:

• EOR: Enables proper employee relationships with benefits and protections
• Contractors: Independent workers, no employment relationship, misclassification risks

EOR vs. Staffing/Recruitment Agency:

• EOR: Long-term employment solution with full compliance
• Staffing Agency: Temporary placements, different legal structure

Benefits of using an Employer of Record

Speed to market:

• Hire employees in days instead of waiting months for entity setup
• Immediate access to talent in new markets
• Quick scaling without bureaucratic delays

Cost efficiency:

• Eliminate entity establishment costs ($20,000-100,000+ per country)
• No need for local HR, legal, and accounting staff
• Predictable monthly costs instead of variable compliance expenses
• Avoid penalties and fines from compliance mistakes

Compliance assurance:

• Expert handling of local labor laws and regulations
• Reduced legal risks in foreign jurisdictions
• Up-to-date knowledge of regulatory changes
• Proper handling of complex requirements (taxes, benefits, terminations)

Operational flexibility:

• Scale teams up or down without entity constraints
• Test markets with minimal commitment
• Exit markets cleanly without entity closure complications
• Manage multi-country operations through single partner

Administrative simplification:

• Centralized payroll and HR management
• Single point of contact for multiple countries
• Reduced internal HR workload
• Streamlined processes across locations

EOR considerations and potential limitations

Cost for large teams: EOR services typically charge 8-15% of payroll or $200-800+ per employee monthly. For very large teams (50+ employees in one country), direct employment may become more cost-effective.

Less direct control: Because the EOR is the legal employer, certain employment decisions must go through them to ensure compliance, which can add process steps.

Dependency on provider: Your employment operations depend on the EOR's expertise, service quality, and financial stability. Choosing the right partner is critical.

Employee perception: Some employees may have concerns about being employed by a third party instead of directly by your company, requiring clear communication about the arrangement.

Selecting an EOR provider

Key criteria for evaluation:

Geographic coverage: Does the provider operate in all countries where you need to hire?

Compliance expertise: Do they have deep knowledge of local labor laws and regulations?

Service quality: What is their reputation for customer service and responsiveness?

Technology platform: Do they offer modern, user-friendly systems for payroll and HR management?

Pricing transparency: Are costs clear, predictable, and competitive?

Experience and track record: How long have they operated? What do clients say about them?

Local presence: Do they have local teams and support in each country?

Benefits offerings: Can they provide competitive benefits packages?

Financial stability: Is the provider financially sound and sustainable?

Country-specific EOR considerations in APAC

The Asia-Pacific region presents unique considerations:

Regulatory complexity: Each country has distinct labor laws, requiring specialized local expertise

Cultural differences: Employment expectations and practices vary significantly across cultures

Language requirements: Contracts and HR communications often need local language versions

Benefits variations: Statutory benefits and market expectations differ greatly

Payroll cycles: Some countries require specific payment timing and methods

Termination complexity: Notice periods, severance, and termination procedures vary widely

Why AYP Group for APAC EOR

AYP is specifically positioned for Asia-Pacific expansion:

• Regional specialization: Deep expertise across 14+ APAC countries
• Established entities: Existing legal presence eliminates setup time
• Local teams: On-the-ground support in each country
• Cultural understanding: Knowledge of local employment cultures and expectations
• Technology platform: Centralized system for multi-country management
• Compliance focus: Proven track record of regulatory adherence
• Singapore headquarters: Strong governance and financial stability

Transitioning from EOR to direct entity

Many companies start with EOR and later establish their own entities:

1. Use EOR for initial market entry (1-20 employees)
2. Validate market opportunity and team growth
3. Reach threshold for direct employment (typically 20-50+ employees)
4. Establish legal entity while maintaining EOR service
5. Transition employees from EOR to direct employment
6. Continue using EOR for secondary locations or flexibility

EOR legal and compliance framework

Employment contracts:

• Drafted according to local legal requirements
• Include all mandatory provisions for the jurisdiction
• Define relationship between EOR, client, and employee
• Specify compensation, benefits, and working conditions

Liability and risk:

• EOR assumes employment-related legal liabilities
• Client retains liability for work product and workplace safety
• Clear delineation of responsibilities in service agreements
• Insurance coverage to protect all parties

Intellectual property:

• IP assignment clauses ensure client owns work product
• Confidentiality agreements protect client information
• Clear contractual framework despite EOR employment

Data protection:

• EOR handles employee data according to local privacy laws
• Data processing agreements govern information sharing
• Compliance with GDPR-equivalent regulations in APAC

Common EOR misconceptions

"Employees won't feel like part of our company" With proper management and integration, EOR-employed workers function identically to direct employees in day-to-day operations.

"It's only for small companies" Large enterprises use EOR services strategically for specific locations or roles even while maintaining direct entities in other markets.

"EOR is just outsourced payroll" EOR encompasses full employment responsibility, not just payroll processing—including compliance, benefits, HR admin, and legal employer status.

"We'll lose control of our team" Client companies maintain complete control over work direction, performance management, and daily operations.

‍